英语电影观后感。
编辑为大家带来了这篇“英语电影观后感”研究报告，或许您想借鉴一些高质量的作品观后感呢？这些作品都有那些能够深深打动人的地方，让我们感叹不已。此时，我们可以用文字将我们的想法记录下来，以便加深我们的记忆。当我们写观后感时，必须掌握文章的主题，才能写出真实的感受。我们希望这篇文章能为您提供灵感！
英语电影观后感 篇1
“RomanHoliday”Review
Noteverystorycanbecomeaclassic,afterwatching"Romanholiday",Ilearnedalot.theprincessthirstforfreedom.ShemetJoBradleyinRome,finallyshehadtoleavehimforhercountry.
Eventheprincessalsohavethelifeshedidn'tlike,moreoverus?
Wearealldesirefreedom.Sometimes,toomuchworkwillmakeusfeel
tired,wecanlearntorelaxourselvesandenjoywonderfulholidays,butaftertheholidays,wealsoneedtogobacktoourhomesliketheprincess,andneedtotakeonourresponsibility.
《罗马假日》观后感
并不是每一段故事都能够成为经典的，看完了《罗马假日》，这是一部感人的著作，渴望自由的公主在与乔·布拉德利在罗马邂逅，最后还是为了她的国家不得不离开照片成为了他们的'美好回忆。
连公主也有自己不喜欢的生活，更何况我们呢？
每个人都渴望自由。有时候，太多忙碌的工作学习与责任将我们束缚，我们可以放纵一下自己，去感受一些美好的生活，但是在那些轻松的生活之后，我们也需要像公主一样回到自己的家园，担负起我们的责任。
英语电影观后感 篇2
、
Parents and children, inspirational, so the words used in qualitative, on the drama is on the excess; effort, struggle, happiness, and this proceis actually on the drama in excess. Art
comes from life than life; a successful television series might not require a highly anticipated new theme and return to life, perhaps the most real life is the highest art. Bottom line of this struggle in poverty in the inspirational family film more approachable, but also much more likely to live many of our emotional resonance.
亲子、励志，这样用于定性的字眼放在这部电影上其实是多余的;努力、奋斗、幸福，这样的过程放在这部电影里其实也是多余的。艺术来源于生活也高于生活;一部成功的电影也许并不需要一个万众瞩目的新奇题材，回归于生活，最真实的生活也许也是最高的艺术了。这部挣扎在贫困底线里的励志亲情电影来得平易近人，也更容易引发我们对生活诸多情绪的共鸣。
英语电影观后感 篇3
电影《卢旺达饭店》
Hotel Rwanda ---- a story of an African Schinderler
Hotel Rwanda is a film about a man。 It was based on a real story of a man who saved 1268 people’s lives in a madness genocidal， which happened in Rwanda， 1994。 The film was directed by Terry George， 2004。 The main actor Don Cheadle is not handsome but just an ordinary man。 You probably will even not recognize him when you happen to meet him on the street。 He acted a hero based on a true story， a man who was as simple as he is， Paul Rusesabagina。 Paul is a hero， a real man， while a hero and a real man doesn’t always need to be handsome or attractive in the appearance。 There are two nations in Rwanda， hutu and tutsi。 Paul is a hutu manager working for a 4 stars hotel on town。 The hutu army planed a genocidal to clear out all the tutsi people in ruwanda。 The tutsi people were suffering a madness blood bath。 Over 800，000 people had been killed within 100 days。 Paul has a tutsi wife， in order to protect his wife， children and other tutsis; he took them to hide in the hotel Rwanda。 There a
re many white people from all over the world lived in this hotel so the hotel is the safest place in Rwanda to hide。 There are 80 UN soldiers in Rwanda but only 4 guarded in the hotel and all of them are not allowed to shot。 If we say that Paul just wanted to save his wife at the beginning， after recognized that there is no one would e to help the tutsis， Paul throw himself into the breach。 He bribed the hutu general by wine and gold， used out every coin of his to purchase the refugees’ lives， ten， a hundred， 2 hundreds， 3 hundreds… more and more tutsi refugees flee to the hotel wishing to survive。 To them， Paul is an angel who keeps a hope for those hopeless people in the calamity。 His goodness his mercy is the key to be alive。
The hotel Rwanda is a dramatically and war film， ingeniously， there was almost no lens for slaughtering; however， the threatener of death was full filling with the whole movie。 One of the tutsi asked Paul，
“Why they are so truculence?”
“ Hatred? Insanity? … I don’t know。”
The event is a humanitarianism disaster and Paul needs no reason to save the lives。 When the world closed its eyes， he opened his arms。 Facing a madness calamity and crazy crowds， the individual’s power is far from enough。 However， Paul saved more than 1000 people’s lives。 Paul Rusesabagina is a hero， a real man， an African Schinderler。
英语电影观后感 篇4
电影观后感英语作文
The crown jewel of 1995's summer blockbusters appears to have arrived early。 It's hard to imagine any motion picture released between now and August matching Mel Gibson's Braveheart for spectacle。 With its clashing armies， heartstopping action， and grand sense of romance， this is the sort of film it's a pleasure to see and review。
Let me state my preferences up front。 I'm a big fan of the epic adventure， a category in which Braveheart， like cream， rises to the top。 There's a lot in this film that's praiseworthy -- not the least of which is its ambition。 Those viewing this picture may be easily reminded of Gettysburg， The Last of the Mohicans， Glory， and such classics as Lawrence of Arabia， El Cid， and Spartacus。 The grandeur is certainly present; nevertheless， Gibson gives us not only memorable battles， but characters of real substance。
Borrowing from masters like Sam Peckinpah and David Lean， the actor/director has crafted an exceptional cinematic tapestry in only his sophomore effort。 Most of the time， three hour movies have a few flat spots， but Braveheart is constantly on the move -- riveting from start to finish。 When the end credits began to roll， I was hard pressed to accept that nearly 170 minutes had elapsed。
The title character is William Wallace （Gibson）， a hero of Scottish history whose legend has surely outstripped fact （in its own unique way， the film acknowledges this）。 Wallace fought for Scotland's freedom in the late 13th century， wielding his broadsword and influence to defeat the forces of King Edward I （Patrick McGoohan）， the British monarch who had declared himself king of Scotland upon the former ruler's demise。
Braveheart builds slowly to its first gritty climax。 Much of the early film concentrates on Wallace's love for Murron （Catherine McCormack）。Their courtship is unhurried， yet this is all preparation。 The real meat of the story， which includes political mechanations， betrayal， and dramatic battles， is yet to e。 Patrick Henry once said， "Give me liberty， or give me death!" That might well be Wallace's motto。 "It's all for nothing if you don't have freedom!" The nobles of Scotland fight for land and riches， but Wallace stands for the individual， and earns respect with words and deeds。
Bulked up and wearing a long-haired wig， Gibson brings his usual wealth of charisma to the title role。 Patrick McGoohan， best known from TV's Secret Agent Man and The Prisoner， is almost unrecognizable beneath a snowy beard。 His Edward the Longshanks exudes an aura of cold menace。 He's a worthy foe for Wallace because his intelligence matches his ruthlessness。 Sophie Marceau， the French actress who plays Princess Isabelle， and Catherine McCormack are both immensely appealing。
英语电影观后感 篇5
Ice Age 冰河世纪观后感
It’s not particularly surprising to be disappointed by any puter-animated film not bearing the Pixar logo。 In fact， until Shrek， 2001’s rollicking success， I wouldn’t have even believed it could happen。 What is surprising， is that Ice Age doesn’t even ATTEMPT to reach Pixar’s Toy Story heights， apparently content to revel in its status as Monster’s， Inc。's second rate， half wit cousin。 Ice Age is yet another “extinction for kids” movie， one of many in a long line of baby dinosaurs， pterodactyl eggs， and sympathetic cavemen。 This time， it’s the ice age， and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man。 Strangely enough， in this early world， animals can talk， and humans cannot。 But when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby， wooly mammoth (Ray Romano)， saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary)， and giant sloth (John Leguizamo) must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to its home。
Visually， Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit of CGI I have ever seen。
Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters， Inc。; or even the gooey， gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly rendered polygons and Acme animated characters。 No hint of photo-realism here。 It’s like paring a Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The Lion King。 Actually， I suspect that is exactly what the folks at Ice Age were going for。
Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags and
Leguizamo one liners。 Some of them are even quite funny。 If that is all that we’re going for here， then I suppose I’m all for it。 But then there are these strange attempts at gut wrenching sappiness， which fall painfully flat amidst sub-video game animation。 Frankly， I’m not even sure the CGI they use here is up to the task of displaying the kinds of emotions these people are trying to illicit from their characters。 The humans more closely resemble totem poles than they do living， breathing， creatures。 It’s laughable watching their
polygon-limited faces trying to emote in response to the story’s attempts at heartfelt， soft touches。
Thankfully， the main characters are animals， which are at least bearably rendered to slapstick fun levels。 As a result， what slapstick there is， is highly entertaining。 Sure， Ray Romano’s vocal talents aren’t particularly spectacular。 But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo cover for his mammoth ineptitude without hesitation。
The story itself is bland， boring， and uninspired， as is the almost laughably bad animation。 The film’s only real saving graces are some slapstick side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of soon-to-be-extinct
melon-hoarding dodos。 Ice Age’s edy is worthy of Bugs， but unless you’re under 5， you’ll be bored with everything else。
英语电影观后感 篇6
英语电影观后感4
Inside Out does a great job illustrating plicated mental processes.Itguides viewers through Riley’s dreams， her subconscious， her imagination and the mechanics offorgetting. But beneath its traditional adventurebased storyline， its philosophy speaks to adults alike.
《头脑特工队》巧妙地阐释了我们复杂的心理活动。它向观众展示了莱利的梦境、潜意识、想象和遗忘过程。可是在传统的冒险为主线的电影外表下，它所传递的哲思让成年人深思。
The"Secret Service"film tells the story of the little girl Riley who moved to San Francisco because of her father"s job change. Her life is controlled by these five emotions.
《头脑特工队》这部影片讲述了小女孩莱利因为爸爸的工作变动而搬到旧金山，她的生活被这五种情绪所掌控。
Riley’s story gives us an answer. Human beings can be both strong and vulnerable. No twoindividuals are identical， and no one is as straightforward as a math equation.
莱利的故事给了我们答案。人类是坚强的也是脆弱的。没有完全相同的两个人，也没有一个人像数学公式一样简单、直白。
