英语电影观后感(范文九篇)。
每朵花都没有一样的时候，人也是一样。将读过的东西，把最受感触、最重要的部分做为中心来写。心得体会是每一个学生必须经历的写作训练，心得体会重点的是提出自己的看法或意见。在写自己的心得体会时要注意些什么呢？推荐你看看以下的英语电影观后感(范文九篇)，欢迎收藏本网站，继续关注我们的更新！
英语电影观后感(篇1)
电影观后感英语作文
The crown jewel of 1995's summer blockbusters appears to have arrived early。 It's hard to imagine any motion picture released between now and August matching Mel Gibson's Braveheart for spectacle。 With its clashing armies， heartstopping action， and grand sense of romance， this is the sort of film it's a pleasure to see and review。
Let me state my preferences up front。 I'm a big fan of the epic adventure， a category in which Braveheart， like cream， rises to the top。 There's a lot in this film that's praiseworthy -- not the least of which is its ambition。 Those viewing this picture may be easily reminded of Gettysburg， The Last of the Mohicans， Glory， and such classics as Lawrence of Arabia， El Cid， and Spartacus。 The grandeur is certainly present; nevertheless， Gibson gives us not only memorable battles， but characters of real substance。
Borrowing from masters like Sam Peckinpah and David Lean， the actor/director has crafted an exceptional cinematic tapestry in only his sophomore effort。 Most of the time， three hour movies have a few flat spots， but Braveheart is constantly on the move -- riveting from start to finish。 When the end credits began to roll， I was hard pressed to accept that nearly 170 minutes had elapsed。
The title character is William Wallace （Gibson）， a hero of Scottish history whose legend has surely outstripped fact （in its own unique way， the film acknowledges this）。 Wallace fought for Scotland's freedom in the late 13th century， wielding his broadsword and influence to defeat the forces of King Edward I （Patrick McGoohan）， the British monarch who had declared himself king of Scotland upon the former ruler's demise。
Braveheart builds slowly to its first gritty climax。 Much of the early film concentrates on Wallace's love for Murron （Catherine McCormack）。Their courtship is unhurried， yet this is all preparation。 The real meat of the story， which includes political mechanations， betrayal， and dramatic battles， is yet to e。 Patrick Henry once said， "Give me liberty， or give me death!" That might well be Wallace's motto。 "It's all for nothing if you don't have freedom!" The nobles of Scotland fight for land and riches， but Wallace stands for the individual， and earns respect with words and deeds。
Bulked up and wearing a long-haired wig， Gibson brings his usual wealth of charisma to the title role。 Patrick McGoohan， best known from TV's Secret Agent Man and The Prisoner， is almost unrecognizable beneath a snowy beard。 His Edward the Longshanks exudes an aura of cold menace。 He's a worthy foe for Wallace because his intelligence matches his ruthlessness。 Sophie Marceau， the French actress who plays Princess Isabelle， and Catherine McCormack are both immensely appealing。
英语电影观后感(篇2)
英文电影观后感英语
《勇敢的心》--观后感Set in the late 13th century， 'Braveheart' is the story of one of Scotland's greatest national heroes Sir William Wallace。 leader of the Scottish resistance forces during the first years of the long， ultimately successful struggle to free Scotland from English rule。。。 Crucially charismatic in the title role， Gibson plays the heroic figure and emerges as a remarkable hero with wit and romantic soul， determined to rid his country of its English oppressors。。。 Wallace's revolution was set in motion， with great obstacles from his countrymen。。。 Many Scottish nobles lent him only grudging support as most of them were more concerned with wealth and titles than the freedom of the country。。。 In fact， the Scottish leaders are in favor of revolt-or not-depending on English bribes。。。 Wallace， by parison， is a man of honor， incorruptible and righteous。。。 He was knighted and proclaimed 'guardian and high protector of Scotland，' but as much as he railed against the Scottish no
bles， submitted to Edward I， King of England， he was astonished and in shock to discover the treachery of the leading Scot contender for the throne—Robert， the Earl of Bruce—to whom he confided ， 'The people would follow you， if you would only lead them。' Sophie Marceau is exquisite as the distressed princeIsabella of France who ends up falling in love with Wallace， warning him out of several traps……Catherine McCormack is a stunning beauty who ignites Wallace's revolution……Patrick McGoohan is chilling， brutal， and vicious as the ruthleEdward I， known by the nickname 'Longshanks。' This king remains simply the embodiment of evil……While Angus McFadyen moves as a nobleman torn between his conscience and political aspiration， and Brendan Gleeson brings strength and humor to his role as the robust Hamish， David O'Hara is very effective as the crazy Irishman who provides much of the film's ic relief from even the most tensed moments……Mel Gibson has reason to be proud of 'Braveheart。' It is a
motion picture that dares to be excessive。。。 Gibson presents passionately the most spaciously impressive battles (yet staged for films) even excessively， and it is his passion and excethat make the motion picture great。。。 The horror and futility of massed hand-to-hand bats are exciting rather repulsive。。。 It is epic film-ma-ki-ng at its glorious best……Gibson's 'Braveheart' focuses on the human side of Wallace， a character so immense， so intelligent， and so passionate， exploring the definitions of honor and nobility， pushing us to follow the hero into his struggle against injustice and oppression。
英语电影观后感(篇3)
The Princess Diaries 2: Royal Engagement
20xx - G - 113 Mins.
Director: _____________________
Producer: _____________________
Written By: _____________________
Starring:
Anne Hathaway, Julie Andrews,
Hector Elizondo, Callum Blue, Chris Pine
Review by: _____________________
NO：(班号) _____________________
I. Synopsis or summary of the plot:
II. Main characters:
III. Vocabulary: the words you have learnt chapter by chapter (be honest)
pronunciation
explanation in English
a sentence in English (not copied from the dictionary)
IV: Conclusion: What message is being told? (if it is any) What was the director’s purpose or intention or the theme of the film? Compare with other realities you know (your country, historical fact or event, other film from the same director or genre…) What’s your opinion?
英语电影观后感(篇4)
《忠犬八公的故事》
This film is based on a true story 。 That happened in Japan in 1935。So I was moved by the spirit of Hachi!
No one has the ability to show his love to only one person during his whole life， let alone make friends with only one person; have the food that never changes year by year; do the same damn thing without plaining and consciousness of exhaustion。 We can’t! However， what we could learn from Hachi is that we should never forget the one we once loved。
In fact ， some research and statistics prove that pets are more sensitive in human’s diseases than we do。 Hachi fetched that ball because he knew that his master would die because of his heart disease。 It’s his only way to hold him back 。 Hachi has been waiting in the weeds， waiting for his only fellow to walk him home。 His hope has been floating in the breeze， carrying his loneliness and misery all above the ground。 Maybe professor knows， but he could never e back。
英语电影观后感(篇5)
电影美的呈现是颇令人惊诧的，《美女与野兽》作为一部享誉世界的经典童话，时隔近七十年的返璞归真，再次被法兰西这个曾创作它的国度搬上银幕，法式电影的浪漫格调与宛若油画般的镜头质感，营造了这奇幻曼妙的光影之梦，这是一场献予大人的法式童话。
谈起《美女与野兽》最为人家喻户晓的当是迪士尼于1991年制作的动画电影，但这并不是这个童话故事第一次被搬上银幕，早在1946年法国便早已然拍摄了同名真人电影，而这次的在度翻拍，技术层面上已然不可同日而语，追求电影镜头的精致，使这个法国著作能完美无瑕的得以还原于银幕，俨然成为了其首要因素，这也是选用曾在《寂静岭》《狼族盟约》中担任导演，见长于场景画面渲染法国导演克里斯多夫·甘斯的原因，就电影成片来看，画面的美感确实达到了令许多好莱坞大片都望其项背的高度，这种独具匠心美的呈现不仅是源于特效的营造，电影中华丽的礼服、夺目的背景、还是那深谙欧式风情精雕细琢的古堡城镇，这独到的美感更在于那法国文化呼之欲出深厚的人文底蕴。
画面的致美却未能在剧情上得见经典是新版的`《美女与野兽》颇为人遗憾之处，作为一部翻拍著名童话的电影，剧情创新或能让观众眼前一亮，但因有其度的把控，顾此失彼以削弱电影人物情感主线为代价，来打造一支新的前世今生的故事辅线，使得电影“美女与野兽”这个核心命题却在新版中显得异常薄弱，爱与被爱的情感渲染因前篇缺乏积淀，1本因是最为真挚感人的这人兽情缘在最后的结合却给人以莫名的牵强突兀，谱写了新的故事，却未能抓住原著经典真正的精髓，这不仅是《美女与野兽》，亦是许多翻拍经名著却未能获得称赞的症结。
对新版《美女与野兽》法式童话的评价并非单纯的褒义，电影虽有其独到的法式浪漫，但剧情的欠缺使这部电影终只是部中肯的童话，却未能成为一部胜于蓝的佳作。
关于题目给出的问题，我的回答是：我要一个温柔的野兽，因为我是小弱弱，嘻嘻……
英语电影观后感(篇6)
《弱点》
This is a can't-miss family movie。 After all， EVERYONE seems to like inspiring family films--especially when it's based on real people。 And， not surprisingly， I had a thoroughly good time watching it--though I do remend you see it with a box of Kleenex nearby。
The film is about a young man named Michael Oher--an extremely large black teenager who has bounced from home to home in the foster care system。 Currently， he's in a new school and no one realizes that he has no place to live。 Yet in spite of having a crack-addicted mother， a father who was killed in prison and every other reason to be an angry powder keg， he's a very gentle and sad soul---who is also enormous and has amazing potential to play football。
A nosy but very nice lady (Sandra Bullock) convinces her husband (Tim McGraw) to bring Michael home。。。at least for the night。 But this one night turns into a permanent living situation and he bees an important part of the family。 However， despite this new living arrangement working out well， Michael is so far behind in school and his GPA so low that he hasn't a prayer to play football in college。 That's because although many schools are now offering him athletic scholarships， his GPA is too low to allow him to accept these offers。 So， with his new family's help， perhaps he can pull up those grades and have a future。
This film is super-inspirational and sweet--mostly because it's true。 I am sure that some poetic license was taken when making the film (I especially wonder if the little brother could be THIS precocious and adorable)， but overall they did a good job of sticking reasonably close the facts。 While I loved Sandra Bullock's performance (she's great as usual)， I was a bit surprised that she received Oscar for it--I did see a few performances in other films that year that I thought were a bit better (such as the leading young lady in "Precious")。 Also， Tim McGraw， while a lesser role in the film， did a surprisingly good job--especially as he's really known as a country singer， not an actor。 All around， a very good film and one that is meant to inspire。
英语电影观后感(篇7)
《爱丽丝梦游仙境》背景华丽，情节乏味
最近超现实的影片非常流行，如《阿凡达》的外星探险故事，《暮光之城》的吸血鬼题材，《爱丽丝梦游仙境》则以续写童话的形式表达了主创人员非凡的想象力。地下王国是这部电影的主要背景，在这美妙的仙境里，无论是动植物的造型、风景还是建筑，一律色彩斑斓，华丽炫目，充满了奇思妙想，如巨大的蘑菇森林，长有笑脸的斑斓花朵，在空中飞舞的微型木马，雄奇壮观的巨型城堡。然而华丽的背景掩饰不了情节的乏味。
本片的故事情节可以用一句话来概括，即19岁的爱丽丝阴错阳差回到童年的梦幻世界，帮助好人打败坏人。但这已经不是伴随我们儿时一起成长的爱丽丝了，本片在童话故事身上套一件成人的外衣，也让它不再局限于儿童片，而是稍微倾向于成人化，这也可以看出导演想尽力做到了全年龄通吃，但是就剧情而言也变得更加荒诞、不合乎情理。很多场景的切换和人物的动作显得很随意、没有铺垫，不知是翻译的原因还是中西方文化的差异。这从影片爱丽丝的台词和表情中也可以发现：有时候她也对这种逻辑迷惑不解。所以用我老婆的话来说超级英雄的故事已经泛滥，多一个童话版的女超人算不得推陈出新。
另外从影片拍摄的技术上说没有任何的新意，看完之后给我的感觉完全没有必要采用3D技术。不管情节、叙事手法还是拍摄技术，我没有感受到它比《阿凡达》更强，虽然他们并不属于同一类型的电影。
迪士尼的动画片《爱丽丝梦游仙境》给我们多少美好童年的回忆，相信大家还记忆犹新，而“被3D”后的19岁爱丽丝却逐渐迷茫在了成人世界，童年过去了就不再回来。
英语电影观后感(篇8)
《功夫熊猫》(《Kung Fu Panda》)的:
Funny!
I see this movie lastweek,
So terrfic,this film make me loving Kung Fu!
My liitle sister love the panda very much ,She ask me which kind annimal of Panda?
I told her its one of the cutiest animal in the world ,it only lives in China.
In this movie, Panda learns how to improve his level of Kung fu，many scence show that this cartoon is so funny,
You can see how things goes on with laugh,
I recommend this film to you.!
The film stars a panda named Po (voice of Jack Black), who is so fat he can barely get out of bed. He works for his father, Mr. Ping (James Hong) in a noodle shop, which features Ping's legendary Secret Ingredient. How Ping, apparently a stork or other billed member of the avian family, fathered a panda is a mystery, not least to Po, but then the movie is filled with a wide variety of creatures who don't much seem to notice their differences.
They live in the beautiful Valley of Peace with an ancient temple towering overhead, up zillions of steps, which the pudgy Po can barely climb. But climb them he does, dragging a noodle wagon, because all the people of the valley have gathered up there to witness the choosing of the Dragon Warrior, who will engage the dreaded Tai Lung (Ian McShane) in kung-fu combat. Five contenders have been selected, the ”Furious Five“: Monkey (Jackie Chan), Tigress (Angelina Jolie), Mantis (Seth Rogen), Viper (Lucy Liu) and Crane (David Cross). Tigress looks like she might be able to do some serious damage, but the others are less than impressive. Mantis in particular seems to weigh about an ounce, tops. All five have been trained (for nearly forever, I gather) by the wise Shifu, who with Dustin Hoffman's voice is one of the more dimensional characters in a story that doesn't give the others a lot of depth. Anyway, it's up to the temple master Oogway (Randall Duk Kim), an ancient turtle, to make the final selection, and he chooses -- yes, he chooses the hapless and pudgy Po.
The story then becomes essentially a series of action sequences, somewhat undermined by the fact that the combatants seem unable to be hurt, even if they fall from dizzying heights and crack stones open with their heads. There's an extended combat with Tai Lung on a disintegrating suspension bridge (haven't we seen that before?), hand-to-hand-to-tail combat with Po and Tai Lung, and upstaging everything, an energetic competition over a single dumpling.
”Kung Fu Panda“ is not one of the great recent animated films. The story is way too predictable, and truth to tell, Po himself didn't overwhelm me with his charisma. But it's elegantly drawn, the action sequences are packed with energy, and it's short enough that older viewers will be forgiving. For the kids, of course, all this stuff is much of a muchness, and here they go again.
Hotel Rwanda ---- a story of an African Schinderler
Hotel Rwanda is a film about a man. It was based on a real story of a man who saved 1268 people’s lives in a madness genocidal, which happened in Rwanda, 1994. The film was directed by Terry George, . The main actor Don Cheadle is not handsome but just an ordinary man. You probably will even not recognize him when you happen to meet him on the street. He acted a hero based on a true story, a man who was as simple as he is, Paul Rusesabagina. Paul is a hero, a real man, while a hero and a real man doesn’t always need to be handsome or attractive in the appearance. There are two nations in Rwanda, hutu and tutsi. Paul is a hutu manager working for a 4 stars hotel on town. The hutu army planed a genocidal to clear out all the tutsi people in ruwanda. The tutsi people were suffering a madness blood bath. Over 800,000 people had been killed within 100 days. Paul has a tutsi wife, in order to protect his wife, children and other tutsis; he took them to hide in the hotel Rwanda. There are many white people from all over the world lived in this hotel so the hotel is the safest place in Rwanda to hide. There are 80 UN soldiers in Rwanda but only 4 guarded in the hotel and all of them are not allowed to shot. If we say that Paul just wanted to save his wife at the beginning, after recognized that there is no one would come to help the tutsis, Paul throw himself into the breach. He bribed the hutu general by wine and gold, used out every coin of his to purchase the refugees’ lives, ten, a hundred, 2 hundreds, 3 hundreds… more and more tutsi refugees flee to the hotel wishing to survive. To them, Paul is an angel who keeps a hope for those hopeless people in the calamity. His goodness his mercy is the key to be alive.
The hotel Rwanda is a dramatically and war film, ingeniously, there was almost no lens for slaughtering; however, the threatener of death was full filling with the whole movie. One of the tutsi asked Paul,
“Why they are so truculence?”
“ Hatred? Insanity? … I don’t know.”
The event is a humanitarianism disaster and Paul needs no reason to save the lives. When the world closed its eyes, he opened his arms. Facing a madness calamity and crazy crowds, the individual’s power is far from enough. However, Paul saved more than 1000 people’s lives. Paul Rusesabagina is a hero, a real man, an African Schinderler.
英语电影观后感(篇9)
Ice Age 冰河世纪观后感
It’s not particularly surprising to be disappointed by any puter-animated film not bearing the Pixar logo。 In fact， until Shrek， 2001’s rollicking success， I wouldn’t have even believed it could happen。 What is surprising， is that Ice Age doesn’t even ATTEMPT to reach Pixar’s Toy Story heights， apparently content to revel in its status as Monster’s， Inc。's second rate， half wit cousin。 Ice Age is yet another “extinction for kids” movie， one of many in a long line of baby dinosaurs， pterodactyl eggs， and sympathetic cavemen。 This time， it’s the ice age， and wooly mammoths roam the earth alongside primitive man。 Strangely enough， in this early world， animals can talk， and humans cannot。 But when a group of would-be-enemies discover a lost human baby， wooly mammoth (Ray Romano)， saber-toothed tiger (Dennis Leary)， and giant sloth (John Leguizamo) must work along side each other in a journey to return the child to its home。
Visually， Ice Age is perhaps the poorest bit of CGI I have ever seen。
Contrasted to the beautiful constructs of Monsters， Inc。; or even the gooey， gloppy creativity of Shrek; Ice Age is nothing but badly rendered polygons and Acme animated characters。 No hint of photo-realism here。 It’s like paring a Bugs Bunny Cartoon to The Lion King。 Actually， I suspect that is exactly what the folks at Ice Age were going for。
Ice Age is really little more than a collection of silly animal gags and
Leguizamo one liners。 Some of them are even quite funny。 If that is all that we’re going for here， then I suppose I’m all for it。 But then there are these strange attempts at gut wrenching sappiness， which fall painfully flat amidst sub-video game animation。 Frankly， I’m not even sure the CGI they use here is up to the task of displaying the kinds of emotions these people are trying to illicit from their characters。 The humans more closely resemble totem poles than they do living， breathing， creatures。 It’s laughable watching their
polygon-limited faces trying to emote in response to the story’s attempts at heartfelt， soft touches。
Thankfully， the main characters are animals， which are at least bearably rendered to slapstick fun levels。 As a result， what slapstick there is， is highly entertaining。 Sure， Ray Romano’s vocal talents aren’t particularly spectacular。 But Dennis Leary and the always-odd John Leguizamo cover for his mammoth ineptitude without hesitation。
The story itself is bland， boring， and uninspired， as is the almost laughably bad animation。 The film’s only real saving graces are some slapstick side trips into the world of an unlucky squirrel and a group of soon-to-be-extinct
melon-hoarding dodos。 Ice Age’s edy is worthy of Bugs， but unless you’re under 5， you’ll be bored with everything else。
